On compressive properties of 3D printed polyvinylidene fluoride composite for implant applications

Numerous studies have reported the use of 3D-printed biocompatible intramedullary (IM) pins of various metals, alloys, and composite materials for a variety of orthopedic requirements in canines. One of the limitations of these IM pins is that they are non-resorbable, and required surgical procedure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thermoplastic composite materials Vol. 37; no. 7; pp. 2270 - 2298
Main Authors Husain, Minhaz, Singh, Rupinder, Pabla, Bahadur Singh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Numerous studies have reported the use of 3D-printed biocompatible intramedullary (IM) pins of various metals, alloys, and composite materials for a variety of orthopedic requirements in canines. One of the limitations of these IM pins is that they are non-resorbable, and required surgical procedures to be followed for their removal after performing the required function in the subject. Some studies have been reported on polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite-based smart IM pins that are partially absorbable. But hitherto less has been reported on the compressive properties of such 3D printed PVDF composite matrix. This study reports the compressive properties of 3D printed (by using fused filament fabrication (FFF) process) PVDF composite (90% PVDF-8% Hydroxyapatite (HAp)-2% Chitosan (CS) by wt.) for a partially absorbable implant for canines. The result suggested that the best setting for the FFF process are nozzle temperature (NT) 235°C, printing speed (PS) 60 mm/s, and raster angle (RA) 45° for the compressive properties (peak load (PL) 1321 N, break load (BL) 1188.9 N, strength at peak (SP) 10.83 MPa, and strength at break (SB) 9.75 MPa). Furthermore, analysis of the PVDF composite (at 10 N load, 300 s, and 60 r/min) outlined wear of 314 µm, friction force of 1.2 N, and a coefficient of friction of 0.14 was observed. The results are supported by the morphological analysis (based on scanning electron microscopy (SEM), % of porosity, grain size No.) of the fracture site.
ISSN:0892-7057
1530-7980
DOI:10.1177/08927057231200005