Are Terrestrial Organisms Able to Live in Contaminated Soil after Fire-Fighting?
There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experim...
Saved in:
Published in | Materials Science Forum Vol. 851; pp. 125 - 129 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Pfaffikon
Trans Tech Publications Ltd
01.04.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experimental purposes, laboratory installation for infiltration was designed and compiled. Infiltration of three FEAs solutions was done before the ecotoxicity testing. Contaminated soil after infiltration was tested for semi-chronic ecotoxicity and reproduction ecotoxicity then. Introductory results indicates differences between each FEA, caused by various composition. Sthamex F-15 was determined as the most ecotoxic agent at all. Whilst Moussol-APS F-15 was evaluated as the agent with least ecotoxicity effect. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Selected, peer reviewed papers from the the 6th conference on Chemistry & Life 2015, September 2-4, 2015, Brno, Czech Republic ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISBN: | 3038357804 9783038357803 |
ISSN: | 0255-5476 1662-9752 1662-9752 |
DOI: | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.851.125 |