Are Terrestrial Organisms Able to Live in Contaminated Soil after Fire-Fighting?

There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials Science Forum Vol. 851; pp. 125 - 129
Main Authors Zlamalova Gargosova, Helena, Hřibová, Šárka, Vavrova, Milada
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pfaffikon Trans Tech Publications Ltd 01.04.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There was performed test of ecotoxicity with using earthworm Eisenia Fetida as chief representative of terrestrial organisms in the study. Soil matrix LUFA 2.3 was selected as a model of natural soil environment. Tested FEAs were follows: Sthamex F-15, Moussol-APS F-15 and Finiflam F-15. For experimental purposes, laboratory installation for infiltration was designed and compiled. Infiltration of three FEAs solutions was done before the ecotoxicity testing. Contaminated soil after infiltration was tested for semi-chronic ecotoxicity and reproduction ecotoxicity then. Introductory results indicates differences between each FEA, caused by various composition. Sthamex F-15 was determined as the most ecotoxic agent at all. Whilst Moussol-APS F-15 was evaluated as the agent with least ecotoxicity effect.
Bibliography:Selected, peer reviewed papers from the the 6th conference on Chemistry & Life 2015, September 2-4, 2015, Brno, Czech Republic
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISBN:3038357804
9783038357803
ISSN:0255-5476
1662-9752
1662-9752
DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.851.125