Refining the Apgar score cut-off point for newborns at risk

Aim: To evaluate the Apgar score predictive power for mortality during different periods in the first year of life in a population with a very low mortality rate. Methods: The records of all singleton live births without severe congenital malformations and length of gestation >25 wk (n= 976635) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa Paediatrica Vol. 93; no. 1; pp. 53 - 59
Main Authors Chong, DSY, Karlberg, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2004
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim: To evaluate the Apgar score predictive power for mortality during different periods in the first year of life in a population with a very low mortality rate. Methods: The records of all singleton live births without severe congenital malformations and length of gestation >25 wk (n= 976635) were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry, 1990 to 1998. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized. Results: Both the 1‐min and the 5‐min Apgar scores were shown to be good discriminators for early mortality, with the area under the ROC curve >0.85. For babies at risk of early death, the selected cut‐off values for the 1‐min Apgar score was >8 for preterm (true‐positive (TP) rate: 83.9%; false‐positive (FP) rate: 17.7%) and term babies (TP rate: 69.4%; FP rate: 6.7%). At 5 min, the analysis revealed that newborns with an Apgar score >9 were at risk for early death (preterm babies: TP rate: 79.8%; FP rate: 13.3%; term babies: TP rate: 73.8%; FP rate: 3.4%). Conclusions: Our analysis did not support the common practice in the clinic or in research of grouping infants at risk in Apgar score groups, i.e. a score below 4 or a score below 7. However, the data presented here allow the clinicians and researchers to identify and define a suitable cutoff point in relation to the quality of neonatal care and resources available, rather than adhering to a historical cut‐off value that has not been studied in depth.
Bibliography:istex:86BB7AD062AB8DB7B13294D1164B1ACAFC10A00E
ArticleID:APA53
ark:/67375/WNG-53B9M1JP-6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0803-5253
1651-2227
DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2004.tb00674.x