Binding and uptake of chylomicron remnants by primary and THP-1 human monocyte-derived macrophages: determination of binding proteins

• Published in: Clinical science (1979) Vol. 101; no. 2; pp. 111 - 119
• Main Authors: Elsegood, C L, Pal, S, Roach, P D, Mamo, J C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.08.2001
• Subjects: Animals; Binding Sites; Calcium - metabolism; Carrier Proteins - physiology; Cell Line, Transformed; Chelating Agents - pharmacology; Chylomicrons - metabolism; Foam Cells - physiology; Gold Colloid - metabolism; Humans; Hydroxycholesterols - pharmacology; Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments - physiology; Ligands; Macrophages - physiology; Male; Microscopy, Electron; Molecular Weight; Monocytes - physiology; Rabbits; Receptors, LDL - chemistry; Receptors, LDL - drug effects; Regression Analysis
• ISSN: 0143-5221
• DOI: 10.1042/CS20010057

The binding and uptake of chylomicron remnants by human macrophages was studied in order to resolve paradoxical observations that have described the putative mechanisms by which postprandial lipoproteins induce foam cell formation. Chylomicron remnants bound to human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMMs) and to the transformed monocytic cell line THP-1 with high affinity (Kd of approx. 5.5 microg of chylomicron remnant protein/ml). Binding was found to be saturable for both cell types, and was strongly inhibited in the presence of unlabelled chylomicron remnants. Ligand blot studies with colloidal-gold-labelled chylomicron remnants identified two cell surface binding sites on both HMMs and THP-1 cells, with molecular masses of approx. 128 kDa and 43 kDa. The high-molecular-mass binding site was found to be the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, based on the strong inhibition of chylomicron remnant binding in the presence of unlabelled LDL, Fab2 antibody fragments to the LDL receptor or calcium chelators. Competition studies suggested that, in HMMs, the LDL receptor appeared to facilitate approximately half of the total chylomicron remnant uptake. In contrast, the LDL receptor was not significantly involved in macrophage uptake of chylomicron remnants by THP-1 cells. The identity of the 43 kDa binding site is presently unknown, but, importantly, expression was not inhibited as a consequence of sterol loading, which was induced by incubating HMMs and THP-1 cells with 25-hydroxycholesterol. In contrast, the expression of the LDL receptor was substantially attenuated following lipid loading. Collectively, our data suggest that, while the macrophage LDL receptor can bind chylomicron remnants and facilitate uptake in non-lipid-loaded HMMs, other sterol-insensitive sites are responsible for the unabated uptake of chylomicron remnants by macrophages. We propose that the 43 kDa macrophage chylomicron remnant binding protein may be a candidate for the sterol loading of macrophages.