The information transmitted at final position in visually triggered forearm movements
Visually triggered forearm movements were analyzed by an Information Theory approach. Human subjects made smooth movements which were characterized by moderate speeds, ranging about 100 degrees per second, by continuity in the position and velocity traces, and attainment of final average EMG levels...
Saved in:
Published in | Biological cybernetics Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 111 - 118 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
01.01.1983
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Visually triggered forearm movements were analyzed by an Information Theory approach. Human subjects made smooth movements which were characterized by moderate speeds, ranging about 100 degrees per second, by continuity in the position and velocity traces, and attainment of final average EMG levels before completion of the movement. We calculated the information transmitted by final position, biceps EMG, triceps EMG, and the ratio of the EMGs. The results were: (1) The information transmitted by final joint angle increased with number of targets but gradually levelled off. The maximum value was slightly over 3 bits, corresponding to an equivalent number of less than nine independent arm positions for a single movement. (2) The information transmitted by the ratio of the EMGs exceeds that transmitted by the biceps or triceps alone. (3) A previous theoretical prediction based on a spring model (Sakitt, 1980a) gives a moderately good fit to the experimental EMG ratio as a function of final position over a large range of angles. Our results lend consistency to two ideas about the nature of visually triggered forearm movements. First, our finding about the EMG ratio suggests that the basic motor program for final position is probably in terms of relative allocation of innervations, rather than looking up individual values. Second, single movements of this kind transmit surprisingly little information. If this is the case, it suggests that very fine accuracy is not achieved by a single program but requires feedback in order to program and execute additional movement. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0340-1200 1432-0770 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF00339979 |