Determination of forming limit curve by finite element method simulations

This paper presents an investigation on the determination of forming limit curves (FLCs) by finite element simulations. The numerical FLCs are determined applying the criteria of strain localization in simulations of the Nakazima formability tests. Two methods to determine the onset of localized nec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProcedia manufacturing Vol. 27; pp. 78 - 82
Main Authors Lumelskyj, D., Rojek, J., Lazarescu, L., Banabic, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper presents an investigation on the determination of forming limit curves (FLCs) by finite element simulations. The numerical FLCs are determined applying the criteria of strain localization in simulations of the Nakazima formability tests. Two methods to determine the onset of localized necking have been compared. The first criterion is based on the analysis of the through-thickness thinning (through-thickness strain) and its first time derivative in the most strained zone. The onset of necking is assumed to occur at the point corresponding to a sudden change of the slope of the strain rate vs. time curve. The limit strain in the second method is determined by the maximum of the strain acceleration, which corresponds to the inflection point of the strain velocity vs. time curve. The limit strains have been determined for different specimens undergoing deformation at different strain paths covering the whole range of the strain paths typical for sheet forming processes. This has made it possible to construct numerical forming limit curves (FLCs). The numerical FLCs have been compared with the experimental one, showing quite a good agreement, especially in the case of the first criterion. This shows that finite element simulations can be used as a potential alternative tool to determine formability limits for sheet forming processes.
ISSN:2351-9789
2351-9789
DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.047