Prior ablation and progression of disease correlate with higher tumor-to-normal liver 99mTc-MAA uptake ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma
Purpose Factors affecting tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (T:N) have implications for patient selection, dosimetry, and outcomes when considering radioembolization for HCC. This study sought to evaluate patient, disease specific, and technical parameters that predict T:N as measured on planning pre- 90...
Saved in:
Published in | Abdominal imaging Vol. 48; no. 2; pp. 752 - 757 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.02.2023
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose
Factors affecting tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (T:N) have implications for patient selection, dosimetry, and outcomes when considering radioembolization for HCC. This study sought to evaluate patient, disease specific, and technical parameters that predict T:N as measured on planning pre-
90
Y radioembolization
99m
Tc-MAA scintigraphy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
99m
Tc-MAA hepatic angiography procedures with SPECT/CT over a 4-year period were reviewed. Data recorded included patient demographics, details of underlying liver disease, tumor size, history of prior treatments for HCC and technical parameters from angiography. Anatomic-based segmentation was performed in 93 cases for measurement of tumor and perfused liver volumes and SPECT counts. T:N were calculated and correlated with collected variables.
Results
Mean calculated T:N was 2.52. History of prior ablation was significantly correlated with higher T:N (mean 3.39 vs 2.24,
p
= 0.003). Cases in which mapping was being performed for treatment of disease progression was significantly correlated with higher T:N (mean 3.35 vs 2.14,
p
= 0.001). Larger tumor size trended toward lower T:N (
p
= 0.052).
Conclusion
Patients with history of ablation and those undergoing treatment for disease progression have higher T:N and, therefore, could be considered for radioembolization preferentially over alternative treatments. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2366-0058 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-022-03718-8 |