How inequality fuels climate change: The climate case for a Green New Deal

Recent proposals in the US and elsewhere aim to tackle climate change and socioeconomic inequalities together through a Green New Deal (GND). GND proposals have been criticized by high-profile advocates of carbon-centric climate policies—advocates who do not perceive socioeconomic inequalities to be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOne earth (Cambridge, Mass.) Vol. 5; no. 6; pp. 635 - 649
Main Authors Green, Fergus, Healy, Noel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 17.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent proposals in the US and elsewhere aim to tackle climate change and socioeconomic inequalities together through a Green New Deal (GND). GND proposals have been criticized by high-profile advocates of carbon-centric climate policies—advocates who do not perceive socioeconomic inequalities to be significant drivers of climate change and who argue that GNDs’ wider agenda will undermine decarbonization efforts. Here, we show that socioeconomic inequalities drive emissions-intensive consumption and production, facilitate the obstruction of climate policies by wealthy elites, undermine public support for climate policy, and weaken the social foundations of collective action. This suggests that integrating certain carbon-centric policies into a wider program of social, economic, and democratic reforms would achieve decarbonization more effectively than carbon-centric policies alone. We show that common policy components of GNDs do indeed tackle the causal mechanisms by which inequalities fuel climate change, and we argue that GNDs enable more effective political strategies than carbon-centric policies. [Display omitted] Green New Deal (GND) proposals have been criticized by high-profile advocates of carbon-centric climate policies—advocates who do not perceive socioeconomic inequalities to be significant drivers of climate change and who argue that GNDs’ wider agenda will undermine decarbonization efforts. Here, we show that inequalities do fuel climate change and that common policy components of GNDs do indeed tackle the causal mechanisms. We argue that GNDs enable more effective political strategies than carbon-centric policies do.
ISSN:2590-3322
2590-3322
DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.005