Interactive computerized morphometric analysis for the differential diagnosis between dysplasia and well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate

To distinguish prostatic dysplasia (or adenosis) from well differentiated adenocarcinoma on transrectal needle biopsy, a morphometric study was conducted on 20 cases of adenosis and 20 cases of well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. About 100 cells for each patient were analyzed by mean...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrological research Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 35
Main Authors Aragona, F, Franco, V, Rodolico, V, Dardanoni, G, Cabibi, D, Melloni, D, Pavone, C, Campesi, G, Pavone-Macaluso, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 1989
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To distinguish prostatic dysplasia (or adenosis) from well differentiated adenocarcinoma on transrectal needle biopsy, a morphometric study was conducted on 20 cases of adenosis and 20 cases of well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. About 100 cells for each patient were analyzed by means of a computerized image analyzer, and mean nuclear diameter, mean nuclear area, mean form factor and number of cells in eight classes of nuclear diameter were studied. The best predictors of malignancy (evaluated by means of Receiver Operating Characteristics curves) were mean nuclear area greater than 28 mu2, presence of more than 5% of cells with nuclear diameter greater than 6.15 mu, and mean nuclear diameter greater than 5 mu. Using these diagnostic criteria the probability of malignancy for a positive specimen rises from 14% (pre-test) to 75% (post-test).
ISSN:0300-5623
DOI:10.1007/BF00261048