Risk Communication of Radiation Exposure for Diagnosis: A Questionnaire Survey

Purpose: We investigated how a radiologic technologist explains to a patient about the risk of radiation exposure involved by the radiological examination. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire link was emailed to 650 radiological techno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Radiological Technology Vol. 77; no. 7; pp. 691 - 699
Main Authors Otsuka, Shun, Arai, Tomohiro, Wagatsuma, Kei, Sugawara, Yasuharu, Horikawa, Daisuke, Sasagase, Kazu, Yoshikawa, Kohki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Kyoto Japanese Society of Radiological Technology 2021
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: We investigated how a radiologic technologist explains to a patient about the risk of radiation exposure involved by the radiological examination. Methods: In this institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional study, an online questionnaire link was emailed to 650 radiological technologists who are members of the National Hospital Kanto Koshinetsu Radiological Technologist Association. The questions to survey risk communication included the ideal and reality explanation for radiation exposure to patients, the respondentʼs educational background, and years of experience. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni correction as a multiple comparison test. Results: Among the 650 radiological technologists, 245 (37.7%) completed the online questionnaire. The most common response was to compare and convey the doses of radiation during examination and background radiation when asked by a patient about risk. In the cross-analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in what was explained according to educational background. According to years of experience, a significant difference in the content was found about explanation of the risk to patients. Conclusions: We clarified the actual condition of risk communication related to the exposure in radiological examinations. In the future, development of risk communication is expected by improving the knowledge and information of “risk” and giving explanations requested by patients.
ISSN:0369-4305
1881-4883
DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2021_JSRT_77.7.691