Inter- and Intra-Subject Transfer Reduces Calibration Effort for High-Speed SSVEP-Based BCIs

• Published in: IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 2123 - 2135
• Main Authors: Wong, Chi Man, Wang, Ze, Wang, Boyu, Lao, Ka Fai, Rosa, Agostinho, Xu, Peng, Jung, Tzyy-Ping, Chen, C. L. Philip, Wan, Feng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States IEEE 01.10.2020; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
• Subjects: Brain modeling; Brain-computer interface; Calibration; Correlation analysis; Data models; Datasets; Electroencephalography; Frequency measurement; Human-computer interface; Information transfer; inter-subject; Interfaces; intra-subject; Learning; Parameters; Spatial filtering; Steady-state; steady-state visual evoked potential; Transfer learning; Visual evoked potentials; Visual stimuli; Visualization
• ISSN: 1534-4320; 1558-0210; 1558-0210
• DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3019276

Objective: Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that can deliver a high information transfer rate (ITR) usually require subject's calibration data to learn the class- and subject-specific model parameters (e.g. the spatial filters and SSVEP templates). Normally, the amount of the calibration data for learning is proportional to the number of classes (or visual stimuli), which could be huge and consequently lead to a time-consuming calibration. This study presents a transfer learning scheme to substantially reduce the calibration effort. Methods: Inspired by the parameter-based and instance-based transfer learning techniques, we propose a subject transfer based canonical correlation analysis (stCCA) method which utilizes the knowledge within subject and between subjects, thus requiring few calibration data from a new subject. Results: The evaluation study on two SSVEP datasets (from Tsinghua and UCSD) shows that the stCCA method performs well with only a small amount of calibration data, providing an ITR at 198.18±59.12 (bits/min) with 9 calibration trials in the Tsinghua dataset and 111.04±57.24 (bits/min) with 3 trials in the UCSD dataset. Such performances are comparable to those from using the multi-stimulus CCA (msCCA) and the ensemble task-related component analysis (eTRCA) methods with the minimally required calibration data (i.e., at least 40 trials in the Tsinghua dataset and at least 12 trials in the UCSD dataset), respectively. Conclusion: Inter- and intra-subject transfer helps the recognition method achieve high ITR with extremely little calibration effort. Significance: The proposed approach saves much calibration effort without sacrificing the ITR, which would be significant for practical SSVEP-based BCIs.