Justification of the Courant–Friedrich's hypothesis in the case of a weak shock. Part I. Presentation of solution to linear problem

As is well known, two solutions of the problem of a supersonic stationary inviscid nonheatconducting gas flow onto a planar infinite wedge are theoretically possible: the solution with a strong shock (the flow speed behind the shock is subsonic) and the solution with a weak shock (the flow speed beh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of mathematical analysis and applications Vol. 355; no. 1; pp. 41 - 52
Main Authors Blokhin, A.M., Tkachev, D.L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 01.07.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As is well known, two solutions of the problem of a supersonic stationary inviscid nonheatconducting gas flow onto a planar infinite wedge are theoretically possible: the solution with a strong shock (the flow speed behind the shock is subsonic) and the solution with a weak shock (the flow speed behind the shock is supersonic). Unlike the well-studied case of a strong shock that is generically unstable [A.M. Blokhin, D.L. Tkachev, L.O. Baldan, Study of the stability in the problem on flowing around a wedge. The case of strong wave, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 319 (2006) 248–277; A.M. Blokhin, D.L. Tkachev, Yu.Yu. Pashinin, Stability condition for strong shock waves in the problem of flow around an infinite plane wedge, Nonlinear Anal. Hybrid Syst. 2 (2008) 1–17], R. Courant and K.O. Friedrichs [R. Courant, K.O. Friedrichs, Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1948] assumed that the solution with a weak shock is asymptotically stable by Lyapunov. Presentation of classical solution to the corresponding problem which is found in the present paper is the first step on the way to justification of Courant–Friedrichs hypothesis on linear level.
ISSN:0022-247X
1096-0813
DOI:10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.01.040