Factors associated with hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers in Guatemala during the COVID-19 pandemic

• Published in: The Journal of hospital infection Vol. 149; pp. 137 - 143
• Main Authors: Fahsen, N., Garzaro, P., Lozier, M.J., Pratt, C.Q., Craig, C., McDavid, K., Vega Ocasio, D., Cordon-Rosales, C., Call, D.R., Ramay, B.M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2024
• Subjects: Guatemala; Hand hygiene (HH); Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs); Low- or middle-income countries (LMICs); Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH); Guatemala; Low- or middle-income countries (LMICs); Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs); Hand hygiene (HH); hand hygiene (HH); sanitation and hygiene (WASH); Healthcare-associated infections (HAI); water; low- or middle-income countries (LMIC)
• ISSN: 0195-6701; 1532-2939; 1532-2939
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.008

Healthcare-associated infections are prevalent in low- and middle-income countries and may be reduced through proper hand hygiene (HH) adherence during patient care. We produced and distributed alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) to 19 public primary- and secondary-level healthcare facilities in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala, and carried out HH observations to assess healthcare workers' (HCWs) HH adherence, and to identify factors associated with this practice. HH adherence was defined as washing hands with soap and water or using ABHR. Observations were conducted before (2021, baseline) and after (2022, follow-up) ABHR distribution to evaluate the evolution of HH practices over time. Bivariate comparisons and mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to explore associations between HH adherence and the following independent variables: healthcare facility level, type of contact performed, timing of HH performance, occupational category of HCW and materials present (e.g., water, soap, ABHR). We observed 243 and 300 patient interactions among 67 and 82 HCWs at each time point, respectively. HH adherence was low for both observation periods (40% at baseline and 35% at follow-up). HCWs were more likely to adhere to HH during invasive contacts, after patient contact, and if the HCW was a physician. HH adherence varied by scenario, which underscores the importance of addressing multiple determinants of behaviour change to improve adherence. This requires interventions implemented with a multi-modal approach that includes both increasing access to HH materials and infrastructure, as well as HH education and training, monitoring and feedback, reminders, and promoting a HH safety culture.