Behavioral Analysis of Drivers Following Winter Maintenance Trucks Enabled with Collision Avoidance System

Winter maintenance trucks (WMTs) often operate at lower speeds during inclement weather and roadway conditions, creating potential safety issues for motorists following close behind. In this study, a new prototype radar-based rear-end collision avoidance and mitigation system (CAMS) was tested to as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransportation research record Vol. 2673; no. 10; pp. 394 - 404
Main Authors Verma, Rajat, Saedi, Ramin, Zockaie, Ali, Gates, Timothy J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Winter maintenance trucks (WMTs) often operate at lower speeds during inclement weather and roadway conditions, creating potential safety issues for motorists following close behind. In this study, a new prototype radar-based rear-end collision avoidance and mitigation system (CAMS) was tested to assess its impact on the behavior of drivers following WMTs. The system is designed to flash an auxiliary rear-facing warning light upon detection of a vehicle encroaching within an unsafe relative headway with the rear of the WMT. A series of field evaluations was performed during actual winter maintenance operations to assess the effectiveness of the system compared with normal operating conditions (i.e., without the CAMS warning light) toward improving driver behavior related to rear-end crash risk. Specifically, two measures were assessed: (a) rate of vehicles encroaching beyond a safe time headway threshold to the rear of the WMT, and (b) the reaction–response time of drivers. Classification and regression tree models were created for identifying the relevant factors influential in determining the change in driver response. The results indicate that this warning light was effective in reducing the likelihood of the subject drivers crossing beyond a relative headway of 4.5 s. It was also effective in reducing the reaction and response times of the drivers by 0.83 and 0.55 s (36% and 20% reduction), respectively. Although the results were encouraging, additional field testing is recommended before conclusions are drawn regarding the traffic safety impacts of the system.
ISSN:0361-1981
2169-4052
DOI:10.1177/0361198119850131