Reproducibility and repeatability of magnetic resonance imaging in dementia

• Published in: Physica medica Vol. 101; pp. 8 - 17
• Main Authors: Morgan, Catherine A., Roberts, Reece P., Chaffey, Tessa, Tahara-Eckl, Lenore, van der Meer, Meghan, Günther, Matthias, Anderson, Timothy J., Cutfield, Nicholas J., Dalrymple-Alford, John C., Kirk, Ian J., Rose Addis, Donna, Tippett, Lynette J., Melzer, Tracy R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.09.2022
• ISSN: 1120-1797; 1724-191X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.012

PURPOSEIndividualised predictive models of cognitive decline require disease-monitoring markers that are repeatable. For wide-spread adoption, such markers also need to be reproducible at different locations. This study assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of MRI markers derived from a dementia protocol. METHODSSix participants were scanned at three different sites with a 3T MRI scanner. The protocol employed: T1-weighted (T1w) imaging, resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI), arterial spin labelling (ASL), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted (T2w) imaging, and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Participants were scanned repeatedly, up to six times over a maximum period of five years. One participant was also scanned a further three times on sequential days on one scanner. Fifteen derived metrics were computed from the seven different modalities. RESULTSReproducibility (coefficient of variation; CoV, across sites) was best for T1w derived grey matter, white matter and hippocampal volume (CoV < 1.5%), compared to rsfMRI and SWI derived metrics (CoV, 19% and 21%). For a given metric, long-term repeatability (CoV across time) was comparable to reproducibility, with short-term repeatability considerably better. CONCLUSIONSReproducibility and repeatability were assessed for a suite of markers calculated from a dementia MRI protocol. In general, structural markers were less variable than functional MRI markers. Variability over time on the same scanner was comparable to variability measured across different scanners. Overall, the results support the viability of multi-site longitudinal studies for monitoring cognitive decline.