Case report: anterograde 2:1 and retrograde 3:2 Wenckebach block during atrioventricular nodal tachycardia: controversies of the upper and lower common pathways

The exact nature of the reentry circuit for the atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and particularly the concept and role of the upper and lower common pathways is not well defined. Although it is well accepted that the His-Purkinje system and the ventricles are not an essential par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 605 - 610
Main Authors Kantharia, B K, Mittleman, R S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Springer Nature B.V 01.12.2000
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The exact nature of the reentry circuit for the atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and particularly the concept and role of the upper and lower common pathways is not well defined. Although it is well accepted that the His-Purkinje system and the ventricles are not an essential part of the tachycardia circuit, controversy still exists as to whether the atria are essential components of the circuit. We describe a patient in whom the AVNRT perpetuated despite the spontaneous development of 2:1 anterograde and 3:2 retrograde block. To our knowledge, such a combination of electrophysiological phenomenon has not been previously reported. The electrophysiological basis of these observations and their clinical implications are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1023/A:1026565531895