Do Investors Benefit from 12b-1 Fees?
Under rule 12b-1, mutual funds are allowed to charge a fee of up to 100 basis points per year to cover marketing and distribution costs. Under NASD rules, a fund may charge a 12b-1 fee of up to 25 basis points per year and still advertise itself as a no load fund. This fee is used to make the funds...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of business Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 21 - 30 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Muncie
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
22.04.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Under rule 12b-1, mutual funds are allowed to charge a fee of up to 100 basis points per year to cover marketing and distribution costs. Under NASD rules, a fund may charge a 12b-1 fee of up to 25 basis points per year and still advertise itself as a no load fund. This fee is used to make the funds charging it more visible to the investing public. The question explored here is very simple; are the investors in no load funds well served by investing in those funds that charge this fee? It is shown here that the no load funds charging 12b-1 fees do not perform as well as the funds that do not charge the fee but that they experience greater cash inflows. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1935-5181 1935-519X 1935-5181 |
DOI: | 10.1108/19355181200700002 |