Places to Hide: Terrain, Ethnicity, and Civil Conflict

Terrain is central to understanding why some countries experience contentious ethnic divisions and civil war. While existing research specifies a direct effect of rugged terrain on civil war (i.e., it impedes state efforts to counter rebellion), we argue that terrain has an overlooked indirect effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of politics Vol. 81; no. 4; pp. 1446 - 1465
Main Authors Carter, David B., Shaver, Andrew C., Wright, Austin L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago The University of Chicago Press 01.10.2019
University of Chicago Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Terrain is central to understanding why some countries experience contentious ethnic divisions and civil war. While existing research specifies a direct effect of rugged terrain on civil war (i.e., it impedes state efforts to counter rebellion), we argue that terrain has an overlooked indirect effect on civil war via its historical influence on the distribution and political status of ethnic groups. We argue that access to variable rugged terrain facilitated the development and survival of more distinct ethnic groups by both restricting interaction among communities in rugged areas and complicating state repression. Both arguments suggest that groups in rugged areas face greater risk of political marginalization. Using geocoded data on civil war, terrain, and the distribution and political status of ethnic groups, we demonstrate that up to 40% of rugged terrain’s effects on civil war are mediated by its indirect effect on the exclusion of politically relevant ethnic groups.
ISSN:0022-3816
1468-2508
DOI:10.1086/704597