Damage State of Non-Engineered Residential Buildings Owing to Earthquakes: A Case Study in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia

The Pacitan Regency of Indonesia is located in an area of high seismic activities. Regrettably, field surveys held in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia have revealed the prevalence of low-income housing structures that do not meet the engineering standards and are vulnerable to damage during earthquakes. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCivil and environmental engineering (Berlin) Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 426 - 439
Main Authors Kristiawan, Stefanus Adi, Safarizki, Hendramawat Aski, Purwanto, Edy, Sangadji, Senot, Trisnawan, Ahda Dinansya, Nugroho, Tonny Setyo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sciendo 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The Pacitan Regency of Indonesia is located in an area of high seismic activities. Regrettably, field surveys held in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia have revealed the prevalence of low-income housing structures that do not meet the engineering standards and are vulnerable to damage during earthquakes. The seismic evaluation of these buildings is urgently required. This study proposes realistic damage state limit values for the seismic damage evaluation of non-engineered buildings. For this purpose, an incremental dynamic analysis was conducted on a sample of non-engineered buildings in Pacitan to evaluate their probable seismic damage. As a result, curves showing the dynamic pushover responses of buildings to various input earthquakes were plotted. These curves were then summarized as three-linear curves, providing a single value for the average response of the structure. Based on this simplified curve, a more realistic damage-state limit for non-engineered structures are proposed. The damage levels of slight (DS1), moderate (DS2), extensive (DS3), and complete (DS4) were determined using the drift ratio at the linear elastic limit, midway point between the linear elastic and yield limits, yield state, and 80% rupture limit, respectively.
ISSN:2199-6512
2199-6512
DOI:10.2478/cee-2024-0033