Fresh and grilled eel volatile fingerprinting by e-Nose, GC-O, GC–MS and GC × GC-QTOF combined with purge and trap and solvent-assisted flavor evaporation

Fresh and grilled eel were investigated with respect to their volatile compounds and different fingerprinting techniques. An electronic nose (e-Nose) was applied to distinguish the odor between fresh and grilled eels. Purge and trap (P&T) and solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) method wer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood research international Vol. 115; pp. 32 - 43
Main Authors Huang, Xu-Hui, Zheng, Xu, Chen, Zeng-Hui, Zhang, Yu-Ying, Du, Ming, Dong, Xiu-Ping, Qin, Lei, Zhu, Bei-Wei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fresh and grilled eel were investigated with respect to their volatile compounds and different fingerprinting techniques. An electronic nose (e-Nose) was applied to distinguish the odor between fresh and grilled eels. Purge and trap (P&T) and solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) method were used to extract volatile compounds and further analyzed by a gas chromatographic combined with quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and a two-dimensional gas chromatographic combined with hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-QTOF). SAFE extracted more ketone, alcohol and high boiling volatiles in eels than P&T. Considering some distinct compounds extracted by P&T, a P&T and SAFE combined method was chosen. There were 155 volatiles detected in fresh and grilled eels, 93 volatiles were identified. Due to the higher peak capacity, GC × GC-QTOF detected 39 compounds more than GC–MS. The key characteristic volatiles of grilled eel were methyl propyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, heptane, octane, and camphene. Volatile fingerprinting can be a reference benchmark for identification and quality appraisal of fresh and grilled eel products. [Display omitted] •Fresh and grilled eel were investigated for their aroma and volatiles.•E-Nose could distinguish the sensory difference between fresh and grilled eel.•Volatile compounds extracted with P&T and SAFE were compared.•Volatile compounds were detected via using GC–MS and GC × GC-QTOF.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0963-9969
1873-7145
DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.056