Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language
This article is drawn from a large-scale ongoing study on linguistic progress in advanced French as a second language (FL2). The performance of 48 English-speaking students who spent their third year of university in France (the ‘experimental’ group)has been compared to that of 39 classmates who cho...
Saved in:
Published in | International review of applied linguistics in language teaching, IRAL Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 365 - 382 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Walter de Gruyter
15.10.2004
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article is drawn from a large-scale ongoing study on linguistic progress in advanced French as a second language (FL2). The performance of 48 English-speaking students who spent their third year of university in France (the ‘experimental’ group)has been compared to that of 39 classmates who chose to stay and study at home in southern Ontario, Canada (the ‘control’ group). The analysis presented here will be limited to three morpho-phonemic variables where native speaker usage can differ considerably from official norms, i.e., ‘liaison’, schwa and the negative particle ne. Results generally point to different pronunciation difficulties at the advanced level than at the beginners' level. Also, comparisons between the experimental and the control groups lead to a reappraisal of the notions of ‘norm’ and phonetic ‘progress’ in spoken French. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:E00771E00BFC2C036DBF180FAC5C9B6EBCB9F51B ark:/67375/QT4-KGWXW3V1-J iral.2004.42.4.365.pdf ArticleID:iral.42.4.365 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0019-042X 1613-4141 |
DOI: | 10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.365 |