Phonetic norm versus usage in advanced French as a second language

This article is drawn from a large-scale ongoing study on linguistic progress in advanced French as a second language (FL2). The performance of 48 English-speaking students who spent their third year of university in France (the ‘experimental’ group)has been compared to that of 39 classmates who cho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational review of applied linguistics in language teaching, IRAL Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 365 - 382
Main Author Thomas, Alain
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Walter de Gruyter 15.10.2004
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article is drawn from a large-scale ongoing study on linguistic progress in advanced French as a second language (FL2). The performance of 48 English-speaking students who spent their third year of university in France (the ‘experimental’ group)has been compared to that of 39 classmates who chose to stay and study at home in southern Ontario, Canada (the ‘control’ group). The analysis presented here will be limited to three morpho-phonemic variables where native speaker usage can differ considerably from official norms, i.e., ‘liaison’, schwa and the negative particle ne. Results generally point to different pronunciation difficulties at the advanced level than at the beginners' level. Also, comparisons between the experimental and the control groups lead to a reappraisal of the notions of ‘norm’ and phonetic ‘progress’ in spoken French.
Bibliography:istex:E00771E00BFC2C036DBF180FAC5C9B6EBCB9F51B
ark:/67375/QT4-KGWXW3V1-J
iral.2004.42.4.365.pdf
ArticleID:iral.42.4.365
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0019-042X
1613-4141
DOI:10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.365