The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 5; no. 9; p. 727
• Main Authors: Fraser, A G, Culling, W, Singh, H, Ruttley, M S, Newcombe, R G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.09.1984
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Blood Pressure - drug effects; Clinical Trials as Topic; Contrast Media; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging; Diatrizoate - analogs & derivatives; Diatrizoate Meglumine; Female; Heart Rate - drug effects; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Hemodynamics - drug effects; Humans; Iodobenzoates; Ioxaglic Acid; Male; Middle Aged; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging; Mitral Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging; Myocardial Contraction - drug effects; Triiodobenzoic Acids
• ISSN: 0195-668X
• DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061733

We compared the haemodynamic effects of a low osmolality contrast medium Hexabrix 320 (meglumine/sodium ioxaglate) with a high osmolality medium Urografin 370 (meglumine/sodium diatrizoate) in 32 patients. Each underwent left ventriculography with both media, which caused similar small and transient increases in heart rate and systolic pressure. In 15 patients with coronary artery disease, the mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased by 4 mmHg after hexabrix compared with 10 mmHg after urografin (P less than 0.01); it returned to normal more quickly after hexabrix. Changes after both media did not correlate with baseline end-diastolic pressure, ejection fraction, or extent of coronary artery disease, and thus left ventriculography was unhelpful as a stress test. In 14 patients with mitral stenosis, hexabrix produced a smaller increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (P less than 0.001), left atrial pressure (P less than 0.01) and mitral valve gradient (P less than 0.05) than urografin. Patients preferred the low osmolality medium (P less than 0.01). There was no difference in angiographic quality. We advocate low osmolality contrast media for patients with poor left ventricular function or severe mitral stenosis.