Online products and consumers: Partisan ratings and mechanisms for affective polarization

•Online ratings of partisan books may further inflame partisan emotions.•2 experiments tested effects of pro- and counter-attitudinal political book ratings.•Counter-attitudinal ratings increased in-party liking via perceived manipulation.•Pro-attitudinal ratings seen as typical of in-party, increas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTelematics and informatics Vol. 54; p. 101467
Main Authors Neo, Rachel L., Johnson, Benjamin K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2020
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Online ratings of partisan books may further inflame partisan emotions.•2 experiments tested effects of pro- and counter-attitudinal political book ratings.•Counter-attitudinal ratings increased in-party liking via perceived manipulation.•Pro-attitudinal ratings seen as typical of in-party, increasing in-party liking.•In sum, book ratings indirectly drove up in-party liking, not out-party dislike. Star ratings play major roles in informing consumer decisions on major e-commerce sites such as Amazon.com. When people evaluate political books, for example, they might gauge whether star rating favorability scores align with their pre-existing political attitudes. The attitudinal stance of these online cues could invariably trigger responses that worsen the affective divide between partisans. However, few studies have identified and explained the mechanisms underlying affective polarization. Using two online experiments, we examine the mechanisms through which ratings induce affective polarization. Findings support warranting theory by consistently showing that counter-attitudinal ratings indirectly drive up affective polarization by increasing positive in-party affect via perceived manipulation. By contrast, pro-attitudinal star ratings polarize by increasing positive in-party affect through perceived in-party prototypicality. These findings challenge assumptions that affective polarization is solely characterized by negative out-party affect, and driven mainly by exposure to counter-attitudinal information.
ISSN:0736-5853
1879-324X
DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101467