A ‘Better Resurrection’ (Hebrews 11.35), but Better Than What?

Nearly all agree that the ‘better resurrection’ (κρείττων ἀνάστασις) of Heb. 11.35 refers to the eschatological, general resurrection, but the majority view that it is to be compared merely with the resuscitations of the women’s sons by Elijah and Elisha stands on weaker foundations than is usually...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal for the study of the New Testament Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 767 - 784
Main Author Brown, J. Tyler
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.06.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0142-064X
1745-5294
DOI10.1177/0142064X241304361

Cover

More Information
Summary:Nearly all agree that the ‘better resurrection’ (κρείττων ἀνάστασις) of Heb. 11.35 refers to the eschatological, general resurrection, but the majority view that it is to be compared merely with the resuscitations of the women’s sons by Elijah and Elisha stands on weaker foundations than is usually recognized. Building on Jon Levenson’s work on ancient, scriptural notions of death and resurrection (2006), the article shows through a close reading of Heb. 11.35 in context that the ‘better resurrection’ is compared most immediately with the ‘redemption’ from captivity the verse’s Maccabean martyrs reject, i.e., a temporary return to life understood as a kind of resurrection, but also with the resuscitations of the faithful women’s sons. Together with the resurrection of Isaac ‘in a symbol’ (ἐν παραβολῇ, 11.19), this conclusion suggests that Hebrews’ catalogue of Israel’s heroes is marked throughout by the proleptic experience of resurrection from the invasive realm of death.
ISSN:0142-064X
1745-5294
DOI:10.1177/0142064X241304361