The Daily Linguistic Practice Interview: A new instrument to assess language use and experience in minority language children and their effect on reading skills

The increasing number of primary students with varying degrees of exposure to a family minority language requires a reflection on whether specific aspects of their daily language experience influence their learning. Indeed, Minority Language Children (MLC) often report difficulties in reading that m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmpersand (Oxford, UK) Vol. 12; p. 100166
Main Authors Carioti, Desiré, Stefanelli, Silvia, Giorgi, Ambra, Masia, Marta Franca, Del Pivo, Giulia, Del Monte, Milena, Travellini, Simona, Marcelli, Antonella, Guasti, Maria Teresa, Vernice, Mirta, Berlingeri, Manuela
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The increasing number of primary students with varying degrees of exposure to a family minority language requires a reflection on whether specific aspects of their daily language experience influence their learning. Indeed, Minority Language Children (MLC) often report difficulties in reading that must be better investigated to exclude neurodevelopmental conditions such as developmental dyslexia. To this aim, we developed a new instrument, the Daily Linguistic Practice Interview. It allows for collecting information about the linguistic practice and use in the family (Scale A) and extra-family context (Scale B), and about the child's linguistic preferences and habits (Scale C). The Interview further provides analogic quantitative measures of minority language active speaking with mother, father, and passive listening, in the form of clocks to paint. The relationship between these linguistic aspects and reading skills was investigated on 79 MLC aged 8 to 11 y.o.through a correlational approach and regression models. Our results show that family and extra-family language use influence accurate lexical recognition, moreover a “mother effect” broadly affects reading skills in the majority language. Our findings suggest that MLC deserve a more careful evaluation of learning disorders with ad hoc standardized tests, that incorporates information about the family language exposure.
ISSN:2215-0390
2215-0390
DOI:10.1016/j.amper.2024.100166