College students’ preferences for tobacco treatment: a discrete choice experiment

Abstract The purpose of this study was to elicit preferences for the ‘format’ and ‘content’ of tobacco treatment among college student smokers, using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. A DCE survey, supplemented with a think-aloud method, was conducted among 54 college students who s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth education research Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 563 - 574
Main Authors Choi, S H, Templin, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published US Oxford University Press 11.12.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The purpose of this study was to elicit preferences for the ‘format’ and ‘content’ of tobacco treatment among college student smokers, using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey. A DCE survey, supplemented with a think-aloud method, was conducted among 54 college students who smoked combustible cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes. Conditional logistic regression models were constructed to determine optimal profiles of treatment. Cutting down nicotine rather than quitting ‘cold turkey’ (P < 0.001) and two-way communication (P < 0.001) were viewed as the most critical attributes for the intervention ‘format’; changing behaviors rather than social groups/peers (P < 0.001) and autonomy (P < 0.001) were viewed as the most critical attributes for the intervention ‘content’. Some preferences varied based on smoking subgroups. Combustible cigarette users preferred interventions with a longer time commitment (P < 0.05) and without nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) (P < 0.001). Think-aloud data supported the DCE findings and further revealed a strong desire for cutting down nicotine and keeping social groups/peers and misconceptions regarding NRTs. Our study findings can guide tobacco treatment tailored to college students. These treatments should be tailored to specific smoker subgroups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-1153
1465-3648
1465-3648
DOI:10.1093/her/cyad035