Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects

Psychophysical studies have been completed with two binaural cochlear implant patients. In our earlier studies [van Hoesel et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3187-3189 (1993); R. J. M. van Hoesel and G. M. Clark, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 106 104, 233-235 (1995)], lateralization experiments s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 102; no. 1; p. 495
Main Authors van Hoesel, R J, Clark, G M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.1997
Subjects
Cochlear Implants
Humans
Loudness Perception
Pitch Perception
Psychophysics
Time Factors
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

More Information
Summary:Psychophysical studies have been completed with two binaural cochlear implant patients. In our earlier studies [van Hoesel et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3187-3189 (1993); R. J. M. van Hoesel and G. M. Clark, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 106 104, 233-235 (1995)], lateralization experiments showed good sensitivity to interaural amplitudes but poor sensitivity to interaural time delays when compared with normal hearing subjects. In the studies presented here, both temporal and binaural intensity interactions were further explored. Interaural time delay (ITD) perception was investigated using direct measurement of the just-noticeable difference (jnd) in ITD. Both rate and place of stimulation were varied. Binaural rate discrimination was measured and compared with monaural rate perception. Binaural intensity interaction was explored for matched and unmatched place conditions by means of loudness summation and central masking studies. Results showed that ITDs for interaural time delays were large when compared to normal hearing, even when place of stimulation on each of the two sides was carefully matched. The jnds in ITD were similar for stimulation rates from 50 to 200 pps, and increased at 300 pps. Rate difference limens experiments showed similar results for diotic and monaural stimuli, but improved jnds for dichotic presentation at stimulation rates below 150-200 pps. Binaural intensity interactions showed loudness summation effects with both patients, for matched as well as unmatched place conditions. Central masking was also observed with both subjects, although it was not found to be place dependent.
ISSN:0001-4966
DOI:10.1121/1.419611