Antibodies to Malondialdehyde‐Acetaldehyde Adduct Are Associated With Prevalent and Incident Rheumatoid Arthritis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in US Veterans

Objective The objective of this study is to determine the associations of protein‐specific anti–malondialdehyde‐acetaldehyde (MAA) antibodies with prevalent and incident rheumatoid arthritis–interstitial lung disease (RA‐ILD). Methods Within a multicenter, prospective cohort of US veterans with RA,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 76; no. 9; pp. 1353 - 1363
Main Authors Aripova, Nozima, Thiele, Geoffrey M., Duryee, Michael J., Hunter, Carlos D., Yang, Yangyuna, Roul, Punyasha, Ascherman, Dana P., Matson, Scott M., Kunkel, Gary, Cannon, Grant W., Wysham, Katherine D., Kerr, Gail S., Monach, Paul A., Baker, Joshua F., Poole, Jill A., Mikuls, Ted R., England, Bryant R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective The objective of this study is to determine the associations of protein‐specific anti–malondialdehyde‐acetaldehyde (MAA) antibodies with prevalent and incident rheumatoid arthritis–interstitial lung disease (RA‐ILD). Methods Within a multicenter, prospective cohort of US veterans with RA, RA‐ILD was validated by medical record review of clinical diagnoses, chest imaging, and pathology. Serum antibodies to MAA‐albumin, MAA‐collagen, MAA‐fibrinogen, and MAA‐vimentin (IgA, IgM, and IgG) were measured by a standardized enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Associations of anti‐MAA antibodies with prevalent and incident RA‐ILD were assessed using multivariable regression models adjusting for established RA‐ILD risk factors. Results Among 2,739 participants with RA (88% male, mean age of 64 years), there were 114 with prevalent and 136 with incident RA‐ILD (average time to diagnosis: 6.6 years). Higher IgM anti–MAA‐collagen (per 1 SD: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.61), IgA anti–MAA‐fibrinogen (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.92), and IgA (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.34–2.37) and IgG (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.92) anti–MAA‐vimentin antibodies were associated with prevalent RA‐ILD. In incident analyses, higher IgA (per one SD: adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.11–1.76) and IgM (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04–1.60) anti–MAA‐albumin antibody concentrations were associated with increased ILD risk. Participants with IgA (aHR 2.13, 95% CI 1.16–3.90) or IgM (aHR 1.98, 95% CI 1.08–3.64) anti–MAA‐albumin antibody concentrations in the highest quartile had an approximately two‐fold increased risk of incident RA‐ILD. Across all isotypes, anti–MAA‐fibrinogen, anti–MAA‐collagen, and anti–MAA‐vimentin antibodies were not significantly associated with incident RA‐ILD. Conclusion Protein‐specific anti‐MAA antibodies to collagen, fibrinogen, and vimentin were associated with prevalent RA‐ILD. IgA and IgM anti–MAA‐albumin antibodies were associated with a higher risk of incident RA‐ILD. These findings suggest that MAA modifications and resultant immune responses may contribute to RA‐ILD pathogenesis.
Bibliography:Supported by the VA (Merit grants I01 BX‐00‐3635 and I01 BX‐00‐4660) and a VA Career Development award (grant IK2 CX‐00‐2203). Dr Thiele's work was supported by the Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development (grant I01 BX004660). Dr Matson's work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH (grant P20‐GM‐130423). Dr Wysham's work was supported by Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Research and Development (grant IK2 CX‐00‐2351). Dr Baker's work was supported by the Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Research and Development (grant I01 CX‐00‐1703) and RR&D Merit award (grant I01 RX‐00‐3644). Dr Poole's work was supported by the US Department of Defense (grant PR200793) and National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (grant R01‐OH‐012045). Dr Mikuls’ work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant 2U5‐4GM‐115458), US Department of Defense (grant PR200793), and the Rheumatology Research Foundation. Dr England's work was supported by the Rheumatology Research Foundation.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
Additional supplementary information cited in this article can be found online in the Supporting Information section
Author disclosures are available at
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42916
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42916
.
ISSN:2326-5191
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.42916