Postdigital Outdoor and Environmental Education

For Taylor (2017), this development demands a paradigm shift and requires OEE to recognise that outdoor learning activities are enmeshed within what I describe as an assemblage of people, places, technological architectures, and rapidly degrading more-than-human ecologies. Montgomery (2015) extends...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPostdigital science and education Vol. 6; no. 2; pp. 416 - 424
Main Author Reed, Jack
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.06.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For Taylor (2017), this development demands a paradigm shift and requires OEE to recognise that outdoor learning activities are enmeshed within what I describe as an assemblage of people, places, technological architectures, and rapidly degrading more-than-human ecologies. Montgomery (2015) extends this, demonstrating how networked spaces have unpicked what were formerly stable social boundaries in the lives of young people. (2018) pick up on this and position engagement with technology in outdoor learning as a critical factor that threatens relationships between students and which limit connections to the natural world. Walter (2013) also suggests that the so-called net-generation needs to be ‘greened’ (e.g. they need to reconnect to nature), but at the same time shows how digital technology could be employed to extend the OEE experience through photographs or blog posts.
ISSN:2524-485X
2524-4868
DOI:10.1007/s42438-022-00323-2