Motion Planning and Object Recognition Algorithms, Vehicle Navigation and Collision Avoidance Technologies, and Geospatial Data Visualization in Network Connectivity Systems

• Published in: Contemporary readings in law and social justice Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 89 - 104
• Main Authors: Konečný, Vladimir, Jaśkiewicz, Marek, Downs, Steve
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Woodside Addleton Academic Publishers 2022
• Subjects: Acknowledgment; Algorithms; Ambiguity; Automobiles; Autonomous vehicles; Behavior; Bibliometrics; Big Data; Blockchain; Collision avoidance; Connectivity; Control algorithms; Data analysis; Data mining; Data processing; Decision making; Driverless cars; Geospatial data; Internet of Things; Layout; Literature reviews; Mapping; Methods; Motion; Motion control; Navigation; Object recognition (Computers); Pattern recognition; Quality assessment; Remote sensing systems; Roads & highways; Sensors; Simulation; Social development; Spatial data; Systematic review; Tracking; Traffic accidents & safety; Traffic congestion; Transportation planning; Visual perception; Visualization; Slovakia; geospatial data visualization; collision avoidance; vehicle navigation
• ISSN: 1948-9137; 2162-2752
• DOI: 10.22381/CRLSJ14120226

This article reviews and advances existing literature concerning motion planning and object recognition algorithms, vehicle navigation and collision avoidance technologies, and geospatial data visualization in network connectivity systems. In this research, previous findings were cumulated showing that sensor data processing and accurate path tracking tools, autonomous vehicle decision-making algorithms, and predictive urban analytics shape networked transport systems. Throughout April 2022, a quantitative literature review of the Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases was performed, with search terms including “network connectivity systems” + “motion planning and object recognition algorithms,” “vehicle navigation and collision avoidance technologies,” and “geospatial data visualization.” As research published between 2019 and 2022 was inspected, only 89 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. By taking out controversial or ambiguous findings (insufficient/irrelevant data), outcomes unsubstantiated by replication, too general material, or studies with nearly identical titles, we selected 13 mainly empirical sources. Data visualization tools: Dimensions (bibliometric mapping) and VOSviewer (layout algorithms). Reporting quality assessment tool: PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment tools include: AXIS, MMAT, ROBIS, and SRDR.