Prospective randomized controlled trial on the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in total hip arthroplasty assisted by a newly designed whole-process robotic arm

• Published in: International orthopaedics Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 413 - 419
• Main Authors: Wang, Wenzhe, Zhang, Zian, Wang, Guanrong, Rong, Chun, Xu, Hao, Lu, Xinzhe, Liu, Yikai, Li, Chenkai, Zhang, Haining
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging; Acetabulum - surgery; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Prospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Accuracy; Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty; Randomized controlled trial; Total hip arthroplasty; Implant placement
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05501-2

Introduction The purpose of this article is to study whether the newly designed whole-process total hip arthroplasty (THA) robotic arm can improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement in THA. Method In this study, 72 patients undergoing THA were prospectively included and randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was treated with THA assisted by a newly designed robotic arm. The control group received THA with conventional surgical methods. The imaging data were compared after operation. Result Compared with the conventional operation, the whole-process robotic arm can more accurately place the acetabular prosthesis in the anteversion safe zone of 5 ~ 25°, but in terms of the inclination angle, whether the reference is the safe zone of 30 ~ 50° or 30 ~ 45°, there is no statistical difference between the two groups. The average lower limb length discrepancy (LLLD) in the experimental group was 3.77 ± 8.31 mm longer than contralateral side, while the counterpart in the control group was 8.39 ± 9.11 mm, with significant difference ( P  = 0.029). The femoral prosthesis was fixed in neutral position in 35 (100%) cases in the experimental group and only 30 (83.3%) in the control group ( P  = 0.036). There was no significant difference in the recovery of hip offset, femoral anteversion, and canal fill ratio (CFR) between the two groups. Conclusion Robotic arm can improve the accuracy of anteversion of acetabular cup, restore the consistency of the length of lower limbs, and more accurately implant the femoral prosthesis to the neutral position in the coronal position. Clinical trial registration number ChiCTR2100044124 (date of registration: 2021–3-11).