Surgical caseload in army general surgery programs: A 10-year retrospective

• Published in: Current surgery Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 307 - 312
• Main Authors: Marier McGuigan, Rebecca, Beitler, Alan L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2002
• Subjects: board score performance; surgical caseload; surgical residency; surgical residency; board score performance; surgical caseload
• ISSN: 0149-7944; 1879-0321
• DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7944(01)00638-9

PURPOSE: Over the past decade, the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) has been affected by a military-wide drawdown. The volume and acuity of patients appears to be declining, raising questions regarding quantity and quality in Army surgical training programs. The purpose of this study is to examine the caseloads of Army general surgery programs compared with national averages, and to compare the board examination performance of Army residents with national pass rates. METHODS: The program directors of all 6 Army training programs were requested to submit resident caseloads and performance on qualifying and certifying examinations from 1990 to 2000. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the American Board of Surgery (ABS) provided resident statistics summaries and board examination statistics, respectively, for the same period. Total caseloads, chief resident cases, performance in defined categories, and board pass rates of military residents were compared with national averages. RESULTS: Four of the 6 programs submitted the requested data. The average caseload for Army residents, both total and chief residents, has been lower than the national average over the past decade. Nationally, total case numbers have gradually increased while military changes have been variable. The number of chief resident cases has trended steadily downward in Army programs at a rate exceeding the national average. The volume of procedures in endoscopy, thoracic, and breast surgery in the Army generally exceeds those recorded outside of the military. Despite the decline in surgical cases in the military, the pass rates in both the certifying and qualifying examinations among Army graduates have been consistently higher than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: Residents who train in Army programs perform fewer operative cases than do their counterparts in civilian programs. The downward trend in the number of chief resident cases over the last 10 years is likely reflective of the changes in military medicine. Despite these trends, Army residency graduates continue to exceed national performance averages on the ABS qualifying and certifying examinations.