Dialogue as a Requiem for Analysis

In this article, we offer dialogue as a means to avoid the objectification of data and the procedurization of analysis that so permeates traditional visions of educational inquiry. For our work, dialogue operates simultaneously as a means of inquiry, an engaging form of data, and an entwined means o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCultural studies, critical methodologies Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 263 - 266
Main Authors Gildersleeve, Ryan Evely, Kuntz, Aaron M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.08.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this article, we offer dialogue as a means to avoid the objectification of data and the procedurization of analysis that so permeates traditional visions of educational inquiry. For our work, dialogue operates simultaneously as a means of inquiry, an engaging form of data, and an entwined means of analysis that disrupts normative formations of research as progressively linear. In this way, dialogue brings about the productive death of data-as-object for analysis. Functionally, our article is a dialogue, one that serves as a requiem for conceptions of analysis as outside data while simultaneously foregrounding data as dialogue. We present our dialogue asynchronously so as to exacerbate our resistance to synthesis and our commitment to a constant rebuilding of understanding. Our asynchronous representation underscores our commitment to dialogic contact, wherein texts live in contact with other texts, joining these texts to our dialogue.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1532-7086
1552-356X
DOI:10.1177/1532708613487871