Provenance and distribution networks of the earliest bronze in the Maritime Territory (Primorye), Russian Far East

Metal artifacts from the Paleometal Epoch (ca. 1100 BC–400 AD) of the Primorye (Russian Far East) have shed new light on the introduction of the earliest bronzes into the Pacific coastal areas of prehistoric Eurasia. However, little is known about raw material circulation and the role of metal in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of island and coastal archaeology Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 329 - 349
Main Authors Hsu, Yiu-Kang, Klein, Sabine, O’Sullivan, Rebecca, Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina S., Popov, Alexander N., Klyuev, Nikolai A., Nikitin, Yury G., Sidorenko, Elena V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis Ltd 03.04.2023
Subjects
Alloying elements
Archaeology
Arsenic
Bronzes
Coastal areas
Coastal zone
Copper
Copper base alloys
Copper ores
Culture
Distribution
Graves
Heavy metals
Historical metallurgy
Isotopes
Lead isotopes
Marine transportation
Metals
Neolithic
Provenance
Raw materials
Stone Age
Tin
Trace elements
Typology
China
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Metal artifacts from the Paleometal Epoch (ca. 1100 BC–400 AD) of the Primorye (Russian Far East) have shed new light on the introduction of the earliest bronzes into the Pacific coastal areas of prehistoric Eurasia. However, little is known about raw material circulation and the role of metal in the context of inter-regional exchange. This paper investigates 12 copper artifacts from major Paleometal settlements using alloy composition, trace elements, and lead isotopes to explore the metal sources and distribution networks. The results suggest that most objects are made of a copper-tin alloy, but some have arsenic as a significant minor element . Geologically, copper is unlikely to have come from local ore sources, but rather from the Liaoxi corridor and Liaodong Peninsula in Northeast China. This may indicate an inland route of metal trade across Northeast China or alternately, a coastal route via the northern Korean Peninsula. Archaeologically, the combined study of artifact typology and chemistry indicates two possible origins for the metal: the Upper Xiajiadian culture in Northeast China and Slab Grave culture in Mongolia/Transbaikal. Remarkably, the connection with Upper Xiajiadian communities parallels the transport route along which millet agriculture spread from Northeast China to the Primorye during the Neolithic.
ISSN:1556-4894
1556-1828
DOI:10.1080/15564894.2021.1958110