Verification of Shoulder External Rotators Strength Measurement Using a Suspension Scale

• Published in: Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 6; p. e26106
• Main Authors: Ueda, Atsushi, Mitani, Yasuhiro, Koda, Hitoshi, Omine, Toshimitsu, Inada, Ryuta, Konishi, Naoyuki, Mori, Shunsai
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Palo Alto Cureus Inc 20.06.2022; Cureus
• Subjects: Bias; Confidence intervals; Injuries; Methods; Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation; Range of motion; Rotator cuff; Statistical analysis
• ISSN: 2168-8184; 2168-8184
• DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26106

BackgroundOf the shoulder external rotators, the infraspinatus and teres minor are the key muscles that contribute to the dynamic stability of the shoulder. It is crucial to properly measure the strength values to evaluate muscle function and training load for shoulder external rotators. A suspension scale (SPS) can measure the mass of the suspended object, and it may be possible to apply it to measure strength. However, the utility of strength measurements using an SPS has not been clarified in previous studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the intra-rater reliability of measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators using an SPS and the relationship between strength measurement using an SPS and a handheld dynamometer (HHD).MethodologyThe participants were 10 healthy males with 20 shoulders (24.5 ± 2.5 years old; height = 172.8 ± 5.4 cm; weight = 69.6 ± 8.1 kg). Upper extremity strength was measured at 90° shoulder abduction, 90° external rotation, 0° horizontal adduction/abduction, 90° elbow flexion, and 0° forearm pronation/supination in the prone position. The isometric strength of shoulder external rotation was measured with the SPS and HHD, and one examiner measured the maximum strength value. The intra-rater reliability of the two methods using SPS and HHD was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1,2), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. The relationship between the SPS and HHD was calculated as the correlation coefficient between the strength values of SPS and HHD.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the strength measurement of shoulder external rotators using SPS was ICC1,2 0.98 (95% confidence interval = 0.95-0.99), and SEM and MDC were 0.3 and 0.9, respectively. The measurements using SPS had no fixed and proportional biases. A significant positive correlation was observed between SPS and HHD (r = 0.94, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe SPS is an alternative to the HHD for measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators. Thus, measuring the strength of shoulder external rotators using an SPS may be applied as a cost-effective and portable assessment method for shoulder function.