No obligatory trade-off between the use of space and time for working memory
Space and time can each act as scaffolds for the individuation and selection of visual objects in working memory. Here we ask whether there is a trade-off between the use of space and time for visual working memory: whether observers will rely less on space, when memoranda can additionally be indivi...
Saved in:
Published in | Communications psychology Vol. 1; no. 1; p. 41 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Nature Publishing Group
01.01.2023
Nature Publishing Group UK |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Space and time can each act as scaffolds for the individuation and selection of visual objects in working memory. Here we ask whether there is a trade-off between the use of space and time for visual working memory: whether observers will rely less on space, when memoranda can additionally be individuated through time. We tracked the use of space through directional biases in microsaccades after attention was directed to memory contents that had been encoded simultaneously or sequentially to the left and right of fixation. We found that spatial gaze biases were preserved when participants could (Experiment 1) and even when they had to (Experiment 2) additionally rely on time for object individuation. Thus, space remains a profound organizing medium for working memory even when other organizing sources are available and utilized, with no evidence for an obligatory trade-off between the use of space and time. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2731-9121 2731-9121 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s44271-023-00042-9 |