Sensitivity Analysis of High-Pressure Methanol—Steam Reformer Using the Condensation Enthalpy of Water Vapor

• Published in: Energies (Basel) Vol. 15; no. 10; p. 3832
• Main Authors: Yu, Dongjin, Kim, Byoungjae, Ji, Hyunjin, Yu, Sangseok
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2022
• Subjects: Carbon monoxide; Comparative analysis; condensation heat transfer; Convective heat transfer; double pipe heat exchanger; Efficiency; Endothermic reactions; Energy; Fuel cells; Fuel technology; Heat transfer; Hydrogen; Inlet temperature; Latent heat; Membrane reactors; methanol–steam-reforming; Nuclear fuels; Operating temperature; Performance evaluation; Phase change; phase change materials; Pipes; Reforming; Sensible heat; sensitivity analyses; Sensitivity analysis; Simulation; Steam; Temperature; Thermal energy; Wall temperature; Water vapor
• ISSN: 1996-1073; 1996-1073
• DOI: 10.3390/en15103832

A methanol–steam reformer (MSR) can safely provide hydrogen-rich fuel for a fuel cell system. Since the operating temperature of an MSR is relatively low, convective heat transfer is typically used to provide thermal energy to the endothermic reactions in the MSR. In this study, the use of phase change heat transfer to provide thermal energy to the endothermic reactions was investigated, which enhanced the temperature uniformity longitudinally along the MSR. ANSYS Fluent® software was used to investigate the performance of the reforming reactions. A comparative analysis using sensible heat and latent heat as the heat supply sources was performed. Using latent heat as a heat source achieved a lesser temperature drop than sensible heat that was under 5.29 K in the outer pipe. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis of methanol–steam-reforming reactions that use phase change heat transfer in terms of the carbon ratio, gas hourly velocity (for the inner and outer pipes of the MSR), inlet temperature (inner and outer pipes), reactor length, and operating pressure (inner pipe) was performed. When the phase change energy of water vapor is used, the wall temperature of the MSR is conveniently controlled and is uniformly distributed along the channel (standard deviation: 0.81 K). Accordingly, the methanol conversion rate of an MSR that uses phase change energy is ~4% higher than that of an MSR that employs convective heat transfer.