Comparison of Dual Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for COVID-19 Evolution: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

Neutralizing antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein reduce COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization, particularly in high-risk individuals. The COCOPREV-R study aimed to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in high-risk SARS-CoV-2 patients treated with dual monoclonal antibody therapies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inViruses Vol. 16; no. 10; p. 1542
Main Authors Zafilaza, Karen, Bellet, Jonathan, Truffot, Aurélie, Foulongne, Vincent, Onambele, Manuela Mireille, Salmona, Maud, Vellas, Camille, Périllaud-Dubois, Claire, Mirand, Audrey, André-Garnier, Elisabeth, Alidjinou, Enagnon Kazali, Brichler, Ségolène, Fenaux, Honorine, Bouvier-Alias, Magali, Hartard, Cédric, Dorival, Céline, Carrat, Fabrice, Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève, Stefic, Karl, Soulie, Cathia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 29.09.2024
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Neutralizing antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein reduce COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization, particularly in high-risk individuals. The COCOPREV-R study aimed to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes in high-risk SARS-CoV-2 patients treated with dual monoclonal antibody therapies and to identify associated virological factors. The COCOPREV-R study retrospectively collected real-world data from high-risk patients receiving Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab or Casirivimab/Imdevimab dual monoclonal antibody therapies (22 February 2021 to 15 June 2021). The study included 1004 patients with COVID-19, of whom 691 received Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and 313 received Casirivimab/Imdevimab. The alpha variant represented 90.1% of those for whom data were available. The risk of hospitalization within 30 days was lower with Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (12.7%, CI 95% [9.9-16.3%]) compared to Casirivimab/Imdevimab (28.4%, CI 95% [22.7-35.1%) ( < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rates were comparable between both groups ( = 0.982). Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity showed no difference between the two treatment groups (95.2% [93.0-96.9%] and 93.5% [89.1-96.6%] until day 30, = 0.851 for Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and Casirivimab/Imdevimab, respectively). Among persistently positive samples with available sequencing results ( = 43), Spike protein changes occurred only in Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab (42.9%) vs. Casirivimab/Imdevimab (0.0%) groups. Q493R (25.0%) and E484K (12.5%) were the most common mutations selected by Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab in follow-up samples. Other factors (immunodepression, comorbidities, and age) did not appear to be associated with the occurrence of Spike protein mutations. A higher rate of hospitalization was seen with Casirivimab/Imdevimab (RONAPREVE ) in comparison with Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab treatment, but with the emergence of Spike mutations only in the Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab group.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
This work was presented at RICAI (Réunion Interdisciplinaire de Chimiothérapie Infectieuse), Paris, France, 17–18 December 2023, as a poster (P-146).
ISSN:1999-4915
1999-4915
DOI:10.3390/v16101542