Host–enemy interactions provide limited biotic resistance for a range-expanding species via reduced apparent competition

• Published in: Diversity & distributions Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 1355 - 1370
• Main Authors: Prior, Kirsten M., Jones, Dylan G., Meadley-Dunphy, Shannon A., Lee, Susan, Milks, Alyson K., Daughton, Sage, Forbes, Andrew A., Powell, Thomas H. Q.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Wiley 01.11.2023; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Anthropogenic factors; Competition; Complementarity; Divergence; Ecosystems; Galls; Host-parasite interactions; Indigenous species; Insects; Morphology; Networks; Niches; Oak; Parasitoids; Pest resistance; Phenology; Population growth; Populations; Range extension; RESEARCH ARTICLE
• ISSN: 1366-9516; 1472-4642
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13763

Abstract Aim As species' ranges shift poleward in response to anthropogenic change, they may lose antagonistic interactions if they move into less diverse communities, fail to interact with novel populations or species effectively, or if ancestral interacting populations or species fail to shift synchronously. We leveraged a poleward range expansion in a tractable insect host–enemy community to uncover mechanisms by which altered antagonistic interactions between native and recipient communities contributed to ‘high niche opportunities’ (limited biotic resistance) for a range‐expanding insect. Location North America, Pacific Northwest. Methods We created quantitative insect host–enemy interaction networks by sampling oak gall wasps on 400 trees of a dominant oak species in the native and expanded range of a range‐expanding gall wasp species. We compared host–enemy network structure between regions. We measured traits (phenology, morphology) of galls and interacting parasitoids, predicting greater trait divergence in the expanded range. We measured function relating to host control and explored if altered interactions and traits contributed to reduced function, or biotic resistance. Results Interaction networks had fewer species in the expanded range and lower complementarity of parasitoid assemblages among host species. While networks were more generalized, interactions with the range‐expanding species were more specialized in the expanded range. Specialist enemies effectively tracked the range‐expanding host, and there was reduced apparent competition with co‐occurring hosts by shared generalist enemies. Phenological divergence of enemy assemblages interacting with the range‐expanding and co‐occurring hosts was greater in the expanded range, potentially contributing to weak apparent competition. Biotic resistance was lower in the expanded range, where fewer parasitoids emerged from galls of the range‐expanding host. Main Conclusions Changes in interactions with generalist enemies created high niche opportunities, and limited biotic resistance, suggesting weak apparent competition may be a mechanism of enemy release for range‐expanding insects embedded within generalist enemy networks.