Implementation and Validation of a Generalized Actuator Disk Parameterization for Wind Turbine Simulations Within the FastEddy Model

ABSTRACT Fast and accurate large‐eddy simulation (LES) of the atmospheric boundary layer plays a crucial role in advancing wind energy research. Long‐duration wind farm studies at turbine‐resolving scales have become increasingly important to understand the intricate interactions between large wind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWind energy (Chichester, England) Vol. 27; no. 11; pp. 1353 - 1368
Main Authors Sanchez Gomez, M., Muñoz‐Esparza, D., Sauer, J. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2024
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Fast and accurate large‐eddy simulation (LES) of the atmospheric boundary layer plays a crucial role in advancing wind energy research. Long‐duration wind farm studies at turbine‐resolving scales have become increasingly important to understand the intricate interactions between large wind farms and the atmospheric boundary layer. However, the prohibitive computational cost of these turbulence‐ and turbine‐resolving simulations has precluded such modeling to be exercised on a regular basis. To that end, we implement and validate the generalized actuator disk (GAD) model in the computationally efficient, graphics processing unit (GPU)–resident, LES model FastEddy. We perform single‐turbine simulations under three atmospheric stabilities (neutral, unstable, and stable) and compare them against observations from the Scaled Wind Farm Technology (SWiFT) facility and other LES codes from the recent Wakebench turbine wake model benchmark. Our idealized LES results agree well with observed wake velocity deficit and downstream recovery across stability regimes. Turbine response in terms of rotational speed, generated power, torque, and thrust coefficient are well predicted across stability regimes and are consistent with the LES results from the benchmark. The FastEddy simulations are found to be at least two orders of magnitude more efficient than the traditional CPU‐based LES models, opening the door for realistic LES simulations of full wind plants as a viable standard practice.
Bibliography:The authors want to express their greatest gratitude to Dr. Branko Kosović and Prof. Julie K. Lundquist for technical insights and facilitating this collaborative research effort. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Paula Doubrawa for providing the experimental data for the three SWiFT benchmarks and the modeling data for the code‐to‐code comparison. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE‐AC36‐08GO28308. Funding is provided by the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the US Government. The US Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US Government retains a nonexclusive, paid‐up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for US Government purposes. Contributions from DME and JAS were funded by the 2022 NCAR Research Applications Laboratory (RAL) Opportunity Award: “Wind Energy Solutions with FastEddy
The authors would like to acknowledge high‐performance computing support from Casper/Cheyenne (doi:10.5065/D6RX99HX) and Derecho (doi:10.5065/qx9a‐pg09) provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL), sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
Funding
®
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office
USDOE
NREL/JA-5000-90301
National Science Foundation (NSF)
AC36-08GO28308; DE‐AC36‐08GO28308
ISSN:1095-4244
1099-1824
DOI:10.1002/we.2941