Hemodynamics during laparoscopic extra- and intraperitoneal insufflation an experimental study

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 11; no. 9; pp. 911 - 914
• Main Authors: BANNENBERG, J. J. G, RADEMAKER, B. M. P, FROELING, F. M. J. A, MEIJER, D. W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Springer 01.09.1997
• Subjects: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Gas Analysis; Carbon Dioxide - administration & dosage; Digestive system. Abdomen; Disease Models, Animal; Endoscopy; Hemodynamics - physiology; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Laparoscopy - methods; Medical sciences; Oxygen Consumption; Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial - methods; Pressure; Random Allocation; Swine; Evaluation; Animal model; Pneumoperitoneum; Cardiovascular disease; Laparoscopic surgery; Experimental study; Pig; Vertebrata; Randomization; Mammalia; Technology; Abdominal disease; Surgery; Blood vessel; Artiodactyla; Endoscopy; Hemodynamics; Localization; Ungulata
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s004649900485

Total extraperitoneal laparoscopic surgery is an alternative to the laparoscopic transperitoneal route; however, its effects on hemodynamics have not been adequately studied. This experimental study compared the effects of intraperitoneal insufflation and extraperitoneal insufflation on hemodynamics and oxygen transport. Sixteen pigs were randomly assigned for intraperitoneal insufflation or extraperitoneal insufflation with 15 mmHg carbon dioxide. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport parameters were taken during an hour of insufflation and analyzed for statistical differences. During extraperitoneal CO2 pneumoperitoneum central venous filling pressures (central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean pulmonary arterial pressure) and end-tidal CO2 increased slower but to a similar magnitude in comparison to intraperitoneal insufflation. Cardiac output and indices of oxygen consumption and oxygen delivery were equally affected by both types of insufflation. Arterial CO2 pressure increased significantly more during intraperitoneal insufflation. The data from this study suggest that extraperitoneal insufflation might result in less cardiovascular impairment than intraperitoneal insufflation.