Evaluation of the impact of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality research funded by the Ministry of Health in Brazil

• Published in: Research evaluation Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 355 - 368
• Main Authors: Angulo-Tuesta, Antonia, Santos, Leonor M. P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 01.10.2015
• Subjects: Brazil; neonatal health research; health research; maternal health research; research impact assessment
• ISSN: 0958-2029; 1471-5449
• DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv022

Evaluating the impact of health research contributes to demonstrating to society the return on investments made. This article analyzes the impact of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality research funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health in 2004. The Canadian Academy of Health Sciences research evaluation framework was applied. The methods used involved articulation between bibliometric and bibliographic databases and analysis of the technical reports of projects funded. Results disclosed a broad diversity of impacts in the four dimensions studied, demonstrating the relevance of governmental efforts to strengthen the management of the priority-based research system, responsible for fund allocation and monitoring of the research outcomes. This study contributes with empirical evidence of impact on the dimensions of advancing knowledge and research capacity-building. Fifty-nine scientific articles were produced by 25 of the 40 studies funded and were published in periodicals indexed in internationally recognized databases. One hundred and forty-seven students from diverse academic levels were involved in the research projects, in particular health degree course students (63) and postgraduate students, particularly those taking master’s degree courses (50). Some studies reported influence on the informing decision-making dimension in clinical management and practice, as well on implementing health interventions. The health benefits dimension registered health system performance indicators. Political changes are needed to structure solid evaluation programs within governmental institutions and to promote effective interfaces between government, researchers, the health system, and society.