Capecitabine or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (CRTCOESC): A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

This phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with those of fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF) in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 42; no. 20; pp. JCO2302009 - 2445
Main Authors Jia, Ruinuo, Shan, Tanyou, Zheng, Anping, Zhang, Yaowen, Lu, Ping, Zhang, Guifang, Wang, Feng, Xu, Zhiqiao, Zheng, Guobao, Tang, Dongxia, Zhang, Weiguo, Li, Wanying, Li, Ruonan, Guo, Yibo, Liu, Lina, Luo, Xiaoyong, Zheng, Yingjuan, Chang, Zhiwei, Wang, Qiming, Wang, Xinshuai, Yuan, Xiaozhi, Kong, Guoqiang, Li, Shuoguo, Yang, Ruina, Zhou, Dan, Ren, Jing, Yin, Weijiao, Li, Jingxia, Zhang, Junqian, Wang, Ziqi, Sheng, Manxi, Xu, Bingyi, Li, Liuyan, Liu, Xiaoyi, Lu, Zhihao, Wan, Lixin, Zhou, Fuyou, Gao, Shegan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer Health 10.07.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with those of fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF) in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients were randomly assigned to receive two cycles of capecitabine, XELOX, or PF along with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Patients in each arm were again randomly assigned to receive two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy or not. The primary end points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). A total of 246 patients were randomly assigned into the capecitabine (n = 80), XELOX (n = 85), and PF (n = 81) arms. In capecitabine, XELOX, and PF arms, the 2-year OS rate was 75%, 66.7%, and 70.9% (capecitabine PF: hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.35]; nominal = .637; XELOX PF: 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27]; = .444); the median OS was 40.9 (95% CI, 34.4 to 49.9), 41.9 (95% CI, 28.6 to 52.1), and 35.4 (95% CI, 30.4 to 45.4) months. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs during the entire treatment was 28.8%, 36.5%, and 45.7%, respectively. Comparing the consolidation chemotherapy with the nonconsolidation chemotherapy groups, the median OS was 41.9 (95% CI, 34.6 to 52.8) versus 36.9 (95% CI, 28.5 to 44) months (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.99]; nominal = .0403). Capecitabine or XELOX did not significantly improve the 2-year OS rate over PF in DCRT for inoperable locally advanced ESCC. Capecitabine showed a lower incidence of grade ≥3 AEs than PF did.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.02009