The Ethics of Opinion in Academe: Questions for an Ethical and Administrative Dilemma

• Published in: Journal of academic ethics Vol. 3; no. 2-4; pp. 183 - 203
• Main Authors: Hiller, Marc D., Peters, Theodore D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Nature B.V 01.12.2005
• Subjects: Cheating; Ethics; Plagiarism; Social Responsibility
• ISSN: 1570-1727; 1572-8544
• DOI: 10.1007/s10805-006-9013-5

If we accept that all plagiarism is wrong, the issue is black and white. But are there more challenging questions that color the issue with shades of gray that may influence or help clarify the ethical underpinnings of the act? Does intent matter? Does the venue matter? Does the form of writing matter? What about a professor when working as a private citizen, rather than in his/her academic role? Might plagiarism be mitigated when there is no associated financial gain? Is a writer's history that exhibits impeccable ethical integrity relevant? Should these factors, and/or other factors, even be considered in a university's administrative response -- or non-response? What might employing an ethical approach contribute to wrestling with the dilemma? The authors explore critical issues that might face a senior academic administrator when confronting the need to respond on behalf of a university to a charge of plagiarism leveled by an influential newspaper against a university professor for a social responsibility-focused opinion-editorial published in this newspaper.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]