Gender Reforms, Electoral Quotas, and Women's Political Representation in Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore
In the last two decades, more than 118 countries and political parties around the world have introduced gender quotas to guarantee women's political representation. While the study of gender quotas and electoral systems is an exciting field, few studies have focused on East Asia. Why do traditi...
Saved in:
Published in | Pacific affairs Vol. 89; no. 2; pp. 309 - 323 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British
01.06.2016
The University of British Columbia - Pacific Affairs |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In the last two decades, more than 118 countries and political parties around the world have introduced gender quotas to guarantee women's political representation. While the study of gender quotas and electoral systems is an exciting field, few studies have focused on East Asia. Why
do traditionally male-dominated parties engage in gender reforms? Have gender reforms improved women's political representation and participation? To address these questions, this introductory article offers an overview of the electoral rules, gender quotas, and candidate selection methods
adopted in three broadly similar cases with different outcomes in Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore. Taiwan and South Korea introduced mixed electoral systems and legislated candidate quotas to improve women's legislative representation at the local and national levels. Singapore resisted
legislating gender quotas while the ruling party voluntarily introduced a party quota in 2009. These gender equality strategies have brought slow and uneven results. Based on qualitative and quantitative methods as well as survey and electoral data, this paper offers new evidence showing why
the effects of electoral systems and quota strategies are not automatic or mechanical, but dependent on the degree of party system institutionalization, electoral competitiveness, legal enforcement, and social-cultural attitudes toward women. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | (JA) Political Science - General 0030-851X(20160601)89:2L.309;1- |
ISSN: | 0030-851X 0030-851X |
DOI: | 10.5509/2016892309 |