Shear-induced motion of a bead on regular substrates at small particle Reynolds numbers

• Published in: Journal of fluid mechanics Vol. 946
• Main Authors: Topic, N., Agudo, J.R., Luzi, G., Czech, F., Wierschem, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 10.09.2022
• Subjects: Experiments; Fluid flow; Geometry; Interstices; JFM Papers; Movement; Reynolds number; Settling rate; Settling velocity; Shear; Shear flow; Shields; Sliding; Slumping; Substrates; Topology; Velocity; particle/fluid flow
• ISSN: 0022-1120; 1469-7645
• DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.633

We study experimentally the impact of substrate topology on shear-flow-induced motion of a single bead at low particle Reynolds numbers. The substrates are regular quadratic and triangular arrangements of fixed spherical particles. Their topology is varied by using different spacings between the spheres. Here, we show that it has a strong impact not only on the critical Shields number for incipient bead motion but also on its motion above threshold. We focus on Shields numbers where the bead velocity is smaller than the settling velocity. For the different substrates, the data on the average bead velocity collapse on a master curve, showing the impact of the critical Shields number on the bead motion. To describe the bead motion, we develop a model for creeping flows based on expressions by Goldman, Cox and Brenner for the flow-induced forces and torques on a moving bead near a plane. Our model considers rolling and sliding motion. The bead detaches from the substrate on the downhill side at larger substrate spacing or higher Shields numbers, and flies through the interstices of the substrate until hitting the neighbouring substrate spheres. While sliding has only a minor effect on the average bead velocity, detachment has a strong impact. At large substrate spacings, it leads to a bistability, usually associated with inertial flows, even for adhesionless particles under creeping-flow conditions. The model shows good agreement with the experimental results.