Transradial access for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Transradial access (TRA) for diagnostic and interventional neurointerventional procedures has recently gained traction over transfemoral access (TFA) in the neurointerventional community. This meta-analysis aims to assess and summarize the utility of TRA in cerebral angiography and neurointervention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInterventional neuroradiology Vol. 30; no. 3; p. 404
Main Authors Rentiya, Zubir S, Kuhn, Anna Luisa, Hutnik, Robert, Shazeeb, Mohammed Salman, De Leacy, Reade A, Goldman, Daryl, Singh, Jasmeet, Puri, Ajit S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Transradial access (TRA) for diagnostic and interventional neurointerventional procedures has recently gained traction over transfemoral access (TFA) in the neurointerventional community. This meta-analysis aims to assess and summarize the utility of TRA in cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. A systematic literature review was performed utilizing Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Using PRISMA guidelines, records were extracted with the following search terms: transradial approach, transradial access, radial access, cerebral angiogram, cerebral angiography, neurointervention, and neuroendovascular. The primary outcomes assessed were case success rate, complication rate, and crossover rate from TRA to TFA. Secondary analysis was performed on procedure time, fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy time per vessel (diagnostic procedures only), contrast dose, radial artery diameter, distal radial artery diameter, and patient preference for TRA over TFA. Sixty-two full-text articles were analyzed for this meta-analysis, representing 12,927 diagnostic and interventional TRA access patients. Our analysis revealed a combined diagnostic and interventional case success rate of 95.9% and complication rate of 3.5%, with crossover to TFA occurring in 4.9% of cases. This meta-analysis demonstrates that TRA access for diagnostic angiography and neurointerventional procedures is a safe and effective approach, though determining a true complication rate is challenging as the definition of TRA complications has changed in various publications over time.
ISSN:2385-2011
DOI:10.1177/15910199221112200