Thermodynamic cycles and electrical charge recovery in high-efficiency electrocaloric cooling systems

• Published in: International journal of refrigeration Vol. 131; pp. 970 - 979
• Main Author: Schwartz, David Eric
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Elsevier B.V 01.11.2021; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Carnot cycle; Charge efficiency; Cooling; Cooling systems; COP; Cycle thermodynamique; Electric charge; Electrical charge recovery; Electrocaloric cooling; Heat transfer; Modeling; Modélisation; Non-vapor compression cooling; Optimization; Otto cycle; Recovery; Refroidissement n’utilisant pas la compression de vapeur; Refroidissement électrocalorique; Récupération de charge électrique; Terpolymers; Thermodynamic cycle; Thermodynamic cycles; Thermodynamics; Cycle thermodynamique; COP; Non-vapor compression cooling; Thermodynamic cycle; Refroidissement électrocalorique; Refroidissement n’utilisant pas la compression de vapeur; Electrocaloric cooling; Electrical charge recovery; Modeling; Récupération de charge électrique; Modélisation
• ISSN: 0140-7007; 1879-2081
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.02.003

•A linearized model provides insight into electrocaloric cooling thermodynamic cycles.•Derivations for Brayton, Carnot, and Otto cycles are provided.•Modeling results highlight the importance of efficient charge recovery.•Brayton and Otto cycles can be more efficient than Carnot cycles in practical systems. This paper introduces a linearized model of electrocaloric cooling. The model is derived for electrocaloric Brayton, Carnot, and Otto cycles, and a more practical hybrid constant voltage-charge (HCVC) variation of the Otto cycle. It is then parametrized for a benchmark terpolymer material. Model outputs are used to examine the system performance under each cycle as a function of temperature lift. The impact of electrical charge recovery efficiency on performance is then investigated to provide insight into system optimization requirements. Practical limitations of charge recovery circuits are discussed in the context of heat and work transfer in each cycle leg. Results indicate that electrical charge recovery efficiency greater than 95% is needed to achieve competitive system efficiency and that this is challenging with a Carnot cycle, despite its theoretical optimality. The Brayton and Otto cycles, in contrast, can achieve cooling efficiencies that approach the theoretical maximum.