Multi-Height Extraction of Clinical Parameters Improves Classification of Craniosynostosis

Introduction: 3D surface scan-based diagnosis of craniosynostosis is a promising radiation-free alternative to traditional diagnosis using computed tomography. The cranial index (CI) and the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) are well-established clinical parameters that are widely used. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent directions in biomedical engineering Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 198 - 201
Main Authors Becker, Anna Maria, Schaufelberger, Matthias, Kühle, Reinald Peter, Freudlsperger, Christian, Nahm, Werner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published De Gruyter 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: 3D surface scan-based diagnosis of craniosynostosis is a promising radiation-free alternative to traditional diagnosis using computed tomography. The cranial index (CI) and the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) are well-established clinical parameters that are widely used. However, they also have the benefit of being easily adaptable for automatic diagnosis without the need of extensive preprocessing. Methods: We propose a multi-height-based classification approach that uses CI and CVAI in different height layers and compare it to the initial approach using only one layer. We use ten-fold cross-validation and test seven different classifiers. The dataset of 504 patients consists of three types of craniosynostosis and a control group consisting of healthy and non-synostotic subjects. Results: The multi-height-based approach improved classification for all classifiers. The k-nearest neighbors classifier scored best with a mean accuracy of 89% and a mean F1-score of 0.75. Conclusion: Taking height into account is beneficial for the classification. Based on accepted and widely used clinical parameters, this might be a step towards an easy-to-understand and transparent classification approach for both physicians and patients.
ISSN:2364-5504
2364-5504
DOI:10.1515/cdbme-2023-1050