Norms, institutions and freedom of speech in the US, the UK and Australia

While it has become accepted that norms can act in institution-like ways, a highly valued norm that has not been examined is free speech. Can free speech be conceptualised as acting in institution-like ways? If it can, what does this illuminate about processes of policy change? I analyse policy chan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of public policy Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 209 - 227
Main Author Gelber, Katharine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While it has become accepted that norms can act in institution-like ways, a highly valued norm that has not been examined is free speech. Can free speech be conceptualised as acting in institution-like ways? If it can, what does this illuminate about processes of policy change? I analyse policy change between 2001 and 2011 in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, a period during which significant new limits were introduced on free speech in relation to national security. In addition to showing how free speech acted in institution-like ways, the analysis suggests three implications: norms can both act in institution-like ways and be subject to change in interaction with other institutions; a broad, cultural level institution can mask policy change at the narrow, rule-based level even where the latter contradicts the former; and complexity and variation in speech regulation can be understood as consequences of the to-be-expected variability in the institutionalisation of a norm.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0143-814X
1469-7815
DOI:10.1017/S0143814X19000187